25 Sep 2014 01:31:10
I'm not sure but when the judge passed MC shouldn't that be the end of it? I understand that a guilty act and blah blah blah but he was not guilty of anything when he took over therefore is doing nothing illegal. As we know other owners are not subjected to this, imo it's above the FL's head. As we know according to FL rules once you own the club you can do as you please. And I read that a pending case won't count, correct me if i'm wrong lads. The fact is he passed the test, to the annoyance of the FL, mot with MC.

1.) 25 Sep 2014
I have no doubt that the FL will pursue their case to have Massimo removed from Leeds however I would argue if they did they would be on thin ice. Although the Football League is an association which governs it's self, due to the massive money in the game the FL cannot see themselves above the laws of the land which was demonstrated by having an independent QC review their decision to stop Cellino taking over in the first place. Law is based upon statue and precedent therefore the decision to remove Cellino based upon him committing a dishonest act could be challenged by Cellino that the FL have set a precedent by not attempting to remove Carson Yeung from Birmingham City, who is currently in jail for 6 years for money laundering. A dishonest act? I think so

2.) 25 Sep 2014
Hi i'm 32 and i'm a leeds fan the fl dose nt like leeds and they wld do any think to get leedsutd out of the football league and all this that they r having a go MC he is doing the best job leeds in a long time. the fl r trying to get MC out of the league if leeds get done for this then Birmingham City should get done as well and if u ask why the fl r having a go at MC about this boat thing and all he could get is a fine but the owner of Birmingham City is in jail and he is still aloud to run the club so the fl need to pull they finger out of they butt and leave leeds alone