20 Mar 2015 06:57:26
well kababman look at what I said now here are the facts matt smith sold for what £500k he played last year scores GOALS and this year scoring GOALS . donkey morison was loaned out last year why not needed and rubbish this year he as start to get games what a goal scoring machine ZERO . so I then said NR SIAD MATT WAS A HANDFUL and he then said on another a day he could of scored a couple . so I questioned who should of been sold my view morison and keeped matt he's young so should get better morison at end of career and the fact speak for themselves one scoring one hitting the corner flag . so you think morison is great must be his mother we have left out ant because we change style and brought in morison who doesn't look like he would ever score my be penalty time to get rid give one of kids a chance etc morison no way no goals no play now he as had a really good run in team but no goals so time to say no more .yes it would be good if he scored ever other game but it is not going to happen so KEBABMAN I want us to ein 3/4 nil ever game but also want to see team get better morison is not the way ok . you have to see it as it is leeds 3-1 saturday

1.) 20 Mar 2015
20 Mar 2015 09:12:19
i think most leeds fans agree selling smith for 500k was poor. the lad was good in first season for us and has done well this year also. I hink everyone would agree he is better than morrision altough maybe morrisionhelps the team out more. however I am not sure matt smith went for 500k it don't make sense to sell ross for 12m and smith for 500k when we 'didnt need to sell' I think fulham brought both of them for 12.5m as a joint bid and MC pu a clase in saying they would leave atslightly different times to make leeds fans not kick up so mch. clever man (MC that is)

2.) 20 Mar 2015
20 Mar 2015 10:45:03
Not sure I have ever said Morison is great, what I did say is for you to quit moaning! You moan when we win lose or draw!
With regards to Matt Smith, I wasn't happy when we sold him, I think he is worth more than £500k and would do a great job for us if he was still there.
As for Morison, his record is shocking and based on that doesn't deserve to start, but what he has offered is helping Redders system which is getting results.
I for one would be more than happy to have a striker who doesn't score but we win every game than having a striker who does score at the expense of winning games.
It's more than just about the striker, it's a team effort!
Just my opinion though

3.) 20 Mar 2015
20 Mar 2015 10:58:04
cant argue with kebab mans logic, I agree if we have a striker who don't score but we win every game that suits me fine. Next year I would be happy with morrison to play every game score no goals and we go up. I also agree while we are winning how canpeople moan, our resuls have been good so pack in your moaning we are doing better than most expected

4.) 20 Mar 2015
20 Mar 2015 13:15:02
it's called having dead wood in a team and carrying a player and does it improve us he didn't play against Fulham from start one is not moaning one is looking for a better team better players and win with style not have someone who is rubbish how many games and if one is honest he will never score yes we should be up near the top but we have play this season no striker to be honest mind you if ant had played more he might have 20 by now morison zero . as for matt that was my point if you read it NR said he was handful is morison and a striker who doesn't score isn't a striker

5.) 20 Mar 2015
20 Mar 2015 14:27:45
If Smith was still here, he'd be nowhere near first choice and we wouldn't be able to play 4-2-3-1 if he was. Morison offers much more and he can defend too, whereas Smith is just a beanpole suited for hoofball. Morison has scored at PL level and played international football, Smith has not and his shooting was dreadful on Wednesday. The fact is we're in a better position without him.

6.) 20 Mar 2015
20 Mar 2015 18:41:55
I don't disagree with anything that's been said here. The thing is that Morisson has never been a prolific scorer. He's usually played as more of a second string to the main striker. So, it's not all his fault. I think we're all agreed that he needs to be replaced for next season, the question is who by? I haven't seen enough of our strikers to have an opinion, but I rather suspect that we don't have the ideal striker for this division in the current squad.

I'm not sure that there is anybody around at the moment in this division or below who would fill that role on a permanent basis. So, do we look at a loan signing from a premier league team? I haven't seen anyone on loan to other championship clubs who have it either. Not sure that Bamford is a premier league player, and if we're going to buy then that's the calibre of player we should be looking for.

7.) 21 Mar 2015
20 Mar 2015 23:33:17
morison prem yes Norwich cost 2.8 million from millwall from Stevenage from bishop storford from Northampton how many games in prem 30 so not even one season so not that great . he did score 30 goals for Stevenage but conference . I think he thinks he is better than the other and that could be the problem to me he doesn't try as hard means he's lazy anyway end of morison just hope he's gone next season but will he go when on good wage???? no he'll want to stay age against him 31 and last chance to earn any way looking forward to good win tomorrow 3-1 . ant mowatt plus one sharp mybe