22 Jun 2016 14:58:34
Lads I appreciate your comments below but my question was not regarding gfh but regarding " time to go Massimo" campaign's silence in regards gfh that campaign seems to have no interest in gfh . Why is it they have no opinion on gfh.

1.) 22 Jun 2016
22 Jun 2016 15:06:00
Wex
I'm sure that campaign sees Good for Hoaxes in a very poor light but the ultimate responsibility lies with MC. He ought to have retained the power to get rid of them even if it takes money. Something of an irony given his reputation for firing people that he seemingly can't get shot of them.

2.) 22 Jun 2016
22 Jun 2016 15:25:04
George why the silence regarding gfh.

3.) 22 Jun 2016
22 Jun 2016 15:29:10
Wex lad, I think because they keep a very low profile (so low you never see any of them! 😂) But seriously they don't have anyone who openly makes waves, interferes or leave themselves to be openly attacked or targeted in the way that MC does, they just don't do anything, and I think they don't know how to! IMO. Massimo is the focal point because he is the largest shareholder and can't help himself as we all now know in putting his foot in it (whimsical decisions) and shoots his mouth off (in the media) I think he is learning his lessons the hard way though and so far this pre season the signs are looking good, new CEO, appointment of GM, new signings starting to happen etc, this GFH problem is one that massimo will have to insist that they sell their shares at a fair price on the grounds that they are SKINT and can't afford a fair imput in the running of our club, can't wait for the season to get going 😎.

4.) 22 Jun 2016
22 Jun 2016 15:33:11
Wex
Maybe they're following the lead from the nomenclature and meaning of our new manager.

5.) 22 Jun 2016
22 Jun 2016 15:48:48
Lets start a list:

How do you attack a silent minority share holder?
MC bought the Club with binding ties to GFH. Its in his power to sort them out; but he won't take the hit and do it.
MC paid an over-inflated price for the Club without due diligence and tied it to GFH. (He even borrowed the money from GFH! ) That's why he'd have to take a loss to sell it.
MC has dismantled the Club and academy, left it languishing in mid table and made it a laughing stock; GFH had no real input to the farce of the last 3 seasons.
MC has no sentimental attachment to Leeds. He tried to buy Crystal Palace and West Ham before Leeds; he was just desperate to get a Club in the premiership and it is proving much harder than the numpty realised.
I appreciate the positivity that's about at the moment, but dread when the next knee jerk emotional decision will spin us off into MC's alternate universe again.
I'd love owners with the vision, plan and resource to propel Leeds to the heights they deserve. I do not believe that MC can do that; GFH are just a distraction. Therefore the focus should remain time to go Massimo, just for when he slips up again!

6.) 22 Jun 2016
22 Jun 2016 16:16:26
You don't know. That's ok . So I guess they just want Cellino to go and they don't mind gfh hanging around feeding off our club.