01 Oct 2016 19:12:31
A well deserved 3 points today but us the fans were put through the ringer in those last 15mins. Why did Monk have to make those 3 substitutions? I personally felt it was unnecessary.

Sako seems to be always the first to go can't he play for the full 90mins? We've yet to see him complete a full game. I thought the ref would have been better suited to refing at headingly with all the fouls he let go; admittedly he didn't favour either side.

1.) 01 Oct 2016
01 Oct 2016 22:06:15
EKW

Rather than tactical or necessarily fitness, I think it's about being loyal to the subs and giving them some game time. No harm in that.

2.) 02 Oct 2016
02 Oct 2016 08:14:16
Antonson was brought on to help Woods who was being two one d by there 2 good lads at the back.

3.) 02 Oct 2016
02 Oct 2016 08:44:37
I get what you are saying but the subs disrupted the team and the formation kept changing to suit the substitutions which further disrupted us. We went from a 4-2-3-1 to a 4-4-2 to 4-3-3. This pushed us further back and allow Barnsley to push forward. I suppose the end justified the means but I personally struggle with the notion of pre-determined substitutions as it makes us predictable and does not always reflect performance and energy levels of those being substituted.

4.) 02 Oct 2016
02 Oct 2016 08:46:58
He made them so you'd have something to complain about. Got to keep you on your toes.

5.) 02 Oct 2016
02 Oct 2016 10:10:54
Did you feel that the substitutions had no impact on our performance Speedy? Your comment is a tad glib without an explanation.

6.) 02 Oct 2016
02 Oct 2016 11:27:54
Notts. I apologise. Wasn't at the game so had to resort to sarcasm (not like me at all) . I'll keep my gob shut next time.

7.) 02 Oct 2016
02 Oct 2016 11:46:50
Fair enough Speedy. A win is a win afterall.