Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Leeds Rumours Member Posts
CA-White2's Profile
CA-White2's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To CA-White2's Posts
To CA-White2's last 5 rumours posts
To CA-White2's last 5 banter posts
To CA-White2's last 5 rumour replies
To CA-White2's last 5 banter replies
CA-White2's rumours posts with other poster's replies to CA-White2's rumours posts
05 Feb 2026 17:08:07
Looks like bad news for the foxes . probably a double dip down to league 1.
1.) 05 Feb 2026 19:33:26
6 points is a joke, should be 60.
2.) 06 Feb 2026 00:33:48
Not enough to send them down unfortunately.
3.) 06 Feb 2026 01:12:37
They're now just outside the relegation places having previously been comfortably mid table, so I think they'll survive. However, since we got a 15 point deduction for a similar infringement, I don't see why the should get away with losing only 6.
4.) 06 Feb 2026 07:05:18
Think mot was right. Anymore would have given us the opportunity to sue them and league.
5.) 06 Feb 2026 23:36:32
I think our 'infringement' was the double administration and non compliance with insolvency rules so not quite the same but was still much harsher than the one Leicester just got. Luton's 30 PT reduction was the largest deduction in football to date so we were still nowhere near that!
6.) 07 Feb 2026 08:57:05
Remind me what luton did Alf? That’s ridiculous. Prob knocked city out the cup or something ?.
7.) 11 Feb 2026 08:00:00
You wouldn’t want to be a foxes fan today. That takes some doing lol. At home too. Ouch. ?.
8.) 11 Feb 2026 17:55:21
Absolute collapse. Enjoy league 1 and thanks for James Justin ?????.
9.) 11 Feb 2026 18:33:00
Luton Town lost 30 points in 2008 due to a combined penalty from the Football Association (FA) and the Football League for financial misconduct, specifically for illegal payments to agents (10 points) and failing to exit administration correctly (20 points) .
21 Jan 2026 21:52:44
Well looks like Palace are falling apart, and maybe ready to join the relation party . Their only remaining forward now wants out . worth a punt to weaken an opponent?
1.) 21 Jan 2026 22:34:37
The market reckons Mateta is worth £40M, (the same as they say for Strand Larsen) , but as those allegedly chasing him include Aston Villa and Juventus he's likely out of our reach. However, Palace are only 3 points ahead of us, their manager is at odds with the club heirarchy, and they still have the UEFA Conference league to worry about, so catching them up has to be a real possibility.
2.) 21 Jan 2026 23:53:33
Ooh what's a relation party? Sounds incestuous.
3.) 22 Jan 2026 00:52:54
Only relatively so Alf. ?.
4.) 22 Jan 2026 04:55:29
Put it away Alf.
5.) 22 Jan 2026 09:10:46
Have we shown any incest in their players?
CA-White2's banter posts with other poster's replies to CA-White2's banter posts
31 Oct 2026 19:13:48
Lots of comments already - We have no threat in the box. Teams now know to mark and foul DCL and once he's out of the game we are toothless. Boogle seems to be in a weird place, giving the ball away to easily - and as usual James lacks that final quality.
1.) 31 Oct 2026 21:53:16
Bogles crossing was appalling and from good positions too.
25 Oct 2026 18:27:35
Crap against a team at the bottom of the table - just completely flat and no imagination. That's two games in a row were we've been flat and seemingly uninterested in winning.
1.) 25 Oct 2026 18:51:27
Throw in the Palace and Brentford game too.
10 Oct 2026 17:49:18
While losing after going one up would be frustrating - we were playing the gunners. We tire after about 60 mins, when their bench was deployed. Our bench on the other hand leaves a lot to be desired and we can't complete with a bench as deep as theirs.
IMHO we stifled them in midfield for 60 minutes, Rice was not in the game until after that. Our player of the game should be AO - he is growing into that forward thinking midfielder and he was hustling
So a huge improvement over last year and something that should keep us out of the relegation zone, as long as we can maintain this level of performance.
MOT.
1.) 10 Oct 2026 19:03:50
Good post CA.
I agree AO was excellent and I don't get why Farke always subs him half way through second half. When he and Okafor come off, which they always do, we lose momentum instantly.
Plenty of positives today. DCL was giving their CBs a tough time and Stach was back to his best, well nearly.
Trafford not great today I thought. Could definitely have saved the first and was in no man's land outside his box later. I expect better from a keeper for what he cost.
2.) 10 Oct 2026 19:20:42
What Corkey said.
3.) 10 Oct 2026 23:43:26
I'll admit pre-season I was thinking Tanaka was suffering the world cup hangover, Longstaff was making the starting place his to lose and that a rumoured £20m bid from Everton or Man U would have been welcome. I liked him but i hated the times he'd be robbed about 40 yards from our own goal.
He's so much better now. Credit to Farke. He was fantastic until the yellow, and after that merely quite good. Its a long season and Longstaff will be needed at times, But they should be thinking about a Tanaka renewal.
Great performance tough result. A first sub-par moment for Trafford. He made a decent save from Odegaard and a very good one from Saka at the end. But should have saved the Calafiori goal.
Manchester United are there for the taking, and they have a tough CL away game beforehand too.
4.) 11 Oct 2026 10:29:16
Credit to Farke? I don't get that Ealing.
5.) 11 Oct 2026 11:11:29
Don't agree that Trafford was at fault for the Calafiori goal Ealing, the shot was clearly miss hit, and deceived him by bouncing up over him rather than coming flat as he anticipated and prepared for. Defence should have stopped the ball coming to Calafiori for the shot anyhow, but one of their few mistakes.
Correct that MU are there for the taking tho, especially after a tough visit to Madrid before they visit ER.
6.) 11 Oct 2026 13:38:13
CORKEY it's what you could say he's damed if he don't and damed if he dose this site would be full of post as before it he didn't bring fresh legs on could have worked and nearly did at the end.
We had them in the first half didn't make it happen next time mate. And we had a long break that goodness that's over.
7.) 12 Oct 2026 09:35:13
All good JR, i still think he was definitely at fault for purely shot stopping - he got a big piece of it. I think Baz summed it up correctly - being 'at fault' isn't in the same league of it being a howler, but i expected him - and im sure he expected - to do better with it. Was it good defending on that one too? No, Gudmundsson got caught under the ball at the far post and we couldn't win the second ball either. Do that around the six yard box and you get punished, even by a mishit.
Jimmy's still a very sound keeper in my book.
20 Sep 2026 16:00:29
That was a tough day at the office. Bogle, stach way off
The subs where not much better
But a point is better than nothing
MOT.
14 Sep 2026 22:15:16
Enjoyed that and hopefully that's all of JT's wobbles out of the way
Pity we gave them one back at the end - would have been great for the clean sheet.
MOT.
1.) 14 Sep 2026 22:48:09
Great Result hope this shuts up the Whining Farke haters on here!
Up The Whites Down The Pints ???.
2.) 15 Sep 2026 11:04:49
Farkey needs to have a word with JT.cut out the dilly dallying on ball. its going to lead to goals conceded.
12 Apr 2024 20:52:36
no deductions this year as it's the EPL not the EFL.
09 Oct 2026 22:49:25
Not excepting much from this game, as we normally play like crap after one of the breaks. But expecting a decent game and an improvement from last years two embarrassments - a point would be amazing and 3 would be out of this world.
10 Sep 2026 01:11:35
Opti, again it was a clear penalty - blame James for it - he didn't have to stand on the guy's foot. The team was not ready for the subs they made, pretty clear.
09 Sep 2026 22:54:17
Sorry op, it was a pk all day long. Why even step on his foot in the first place? I think we all expected a tough game, but we all saw the changes they made at the half, so why not counter those changes and see where the game goes.
We all knew there were a couple of players that would not go the full 90, so why not have the subs up and ready after the pk - it's about reading the game and knowing your players, and if the intent was to never win the game, then why make all the changes after we go 4-2 down.
Again, not reading the game
Tin hat firmly on - bang away. As was said in a movie, "you'd give an aspirin and a really bad headache."
MOT.
02 Sep 2026 23:56:56
Baz, do you dream of DJ every night?
07 Aug 2026 18:37:48
Go on then, date yourself, Baz - who are the top 6?